Monday, March 7, 2011

How To Get Rid Of Baby Gas With Baking Soda

Passion Flowers Ebook [Reprise]

There is another aspect of the question that struck me the ebook and I'm afraid I'll end on which to chew enough. And it is the social side of the issue. Social reading, social writing. Now, I have my writing on the social fixed. If we take Wu Ming, I have not seen anything so far, among the productions of many hands, it is worth entering into the annals of literature. But I must say that I think the same of writers misrepresent improvised appearing on the Web. The fact that we put together of words, phrases, a semblance of plot does not change a modest scribblers in authors. Maybe things will change over time, but to me this social dimension of writing leaves much puzzled. Even combined with built in desk, as Camilleri, Lucarelli last summer, leaving a very little 'as long as you are and I do not know if it is a social network to create Fruttero & Lucentini Sjöwall & Wahlöö or tomorrow.
separate issue is the social reading. The matter is simple, especially when the functional integration of new e-reader communication, the idea is to create real social platforms involve reading in which readers and authors, perhaps in reading group sessions, forums, groups. Bello. Bello. Bello.
But
But when I read I tend to immerse myself in an individual experience. And 'when I finished reading that I shoot the desire of sharing and comparison. So, for example, right now to me the idea that one can see on the Kindle in a book, a sort of top ten or top twenty of the most highlighted phrases from readers all over the world send a little 'head down. Chemmefrega if 50 people have all stressed the same passage? There is a criterion of relevance in the reading? Right now, the only thing that comforts me is the thought that the voluntary nature in these matters is still crucial. They are social, if I want. I agree, if I want. For now I will not. There.

0 comments:

Post a Comment